TOPONYMS FORMED ON THE BASIS OF THE TITLE BIY

Abstract

Subject of study. The monosyllabic word that makes up the names of place names represents an etymological analysis of root words belonging to the Kyrgyz-Turkish linguistic layer. The purpose of the study is to compare the toponym with the lexical units of related languages ​​and, based on linguistic facts, determine its internal quality. Research methods include semantic analysis within the framework of the comparative historical method along with etymological analysis Value of the study The value of the study lies in the fact that for the first time, based on the historical-comparative method, an etymological analysis of toponyms was carried out. The lexical-semantic and structural-speech models were confirmed, and the features of the formation of toponyms were explained using the historical-linguistic method. The results have been received. According to the investigation, the monosyllabic root of the word biy among the Khakassians, Altaians, Tuvinians and other Turkic peoples of Siberia means “a leader, a leader by official rank, region, a separate large group, a respected person, known for his justice.” among the people, specially chosen, and groups of claims, disputes. It is defined to mean “a person who judges and makes a deal in resolving disputes.” Since the time of Manas, among the ancient Kyrgyz, the title biy was considered a level of power and expressed the meaning “ruler, leader, leader, judge, authority.” Therefore, the trial is conducted by the “people's” judge, elected by the nomads (the people). As a practical value of the study, it can serve as a linguistic basis for conducting various (etymological, semasiological, lexicological) analyzes in Kyrgyz linguistics. Offer. When studying toponyms made up of monosyllabic root words, one should determine their original origin, and through studying the history of the language, guide the future generation, especially young people, to know their history, preserve its sacredness, and recognize it as a great spirit. Only then will the scientist make a small contribution to Kyrgyz linguistics and Kyrgyz history. After all, this question is his sacred duty.